?

Log in

No account? Create an account
Reflections On The Glorious History Of Conservatism - Eric's House Of Ego
November 5th, 2008
01:37 pm

[Link]

Previous Entry Share Next Entry
Reflections On The Glorious History Of Conservatism
By William S.E. Coleman, Ph.D.


The Republicans say Liberals are immoral and evil – and quite un-Christian. They insist that conservatives are compassionate, moral and very, very Christian. Before we accept those assertions, let's look at the historical record.

Soon after we seized land from the Indians and set out to destroy them as a race, conservative religious fundamentalists drowned and burned alleged witches at the stake. Religious conservatives sanctioned and legalized these horrors. Drowning and burning, of course, were a proper form of Christian religious instruction.

During the Revolutionary War “Loyalist” conservatives sided with the British. Subversive liberals revolted against tyranny and formed our nation. Conservatives even now resent the fact that the Divine right of rule is not possible in the United States, but they are still trying.

In the early years of our country, liberals fought to extend voting rights to those who had no property. Compassionate conservatives opposed it. They argued that if you didn't have the gumption to earn enough money to buy property, you didn't deserve the right to vote.

Then those same conservatives created a poll tax so the poor could not afford to vote. Those radical liberals fought against the poll tax for several generations - until it was repealed.

Evil liberals fought against slavery. Compassionate racist conservatives saw slaves as private property and fought to preserve that economically efficient institution. No wages meant more profits. How Christian!

After the Civil War compassionate conservatives kept former slaves from voting for generations. Un-Christian liberals tried to give these newly freed citizens the vote. More than a few died in that fight. Of course, they were killed by compassionate conservatives belonging to the Ku Klux Klan, a self-proclaimed Christian organization dedicated to instructing freed slaves to keep their place by beating, mutilating, and lynching them. That, of course, was a Christian and compassionate form of teaching.

Compassionate conservatives invented segregation, a device that kept an inferior race from copulating with their lily-white daughters. However, it was permissible for their sons to dally with young Black women. The sexual instruction they gained gave them more expertise in their marriages to pure white Southern women.

Bolshevik liberals fought for the creation of labor unions and the right to organize and strike for better wages. Compassionate conservatives shot some of these dreadful agitators down. After all, private property was far more sacred than the right of the poor to put food on their tables. What is this mumbo jumbo that pleads, “Give us this day our daily bread”?

Liberals, intent on destroying the sacred institution of marriage, fought for women's right to vote. Compassionate conservatives told us (and still do) that their conservative God wants women to stay in their place, service their husbands on demand, get frequently pregnant, and stay within the shelter of their homes. To their credit, they didn’t demand their wives to wear burkas. Baggy, unrevealing dresses did very nicely. There was a practicality in keeping women in their place. The more children these dutiful wives had, the cheaper the labor supply was. Heathen liberals had the audacity to say their God wants women to have opinions, that women should the right for equal pay for equal work, and - horrors! - the right of biological choice.

During the FDR years, compassionate conservatives fought against rural electrification - until they owned the power companies.

Compassionate conservatives, afraid that their children would have an uncontrollable biological urge to intermarry with liberal children, set up private schools and colleges and universities to keep their young away from all those evil poor children. In retaliation, anarchist liberals funded and built public schools and set up land grant universities with low tuition. Wisely, compassionate conservatives kept the funding low for such subversive educational activities.

Evil, conniving liberals instituted the graduated income tax. Compassionate conservatives fought against it. How dare the many ask the privileged few to pay their share of protecting and improving our country? Compassionate conservatives believe that the underpaid many should contribute to the rich's lavish life style.

Then, when we weren't looking, our Congress - those fine honest fellow - put in tax dodges so the rich can have those hard earned second mansions, yachts, and corporate meetings at exotic far away places. Since those wonderful compassionate conservatives worked so hard, they have the recreational right to hire expensive call girls and deduct their services from their tax bill. Compassionate conservatives love offshore tax shelters. That way they don't have to support the ungrateful poor with tax money.

Liberal FDR, may his soul rot in hell, created that tool of the Devil, Social Security. Compassionate conservatives opposed it. Only their elderly should live to a comfortable and ripe old age. Let those poor old coots eat dog food!

Compassionate conservatives tell us we have received tax cuts. Ours may buy us an extra bag of groceries once a month. Theirs buys them yachts. They know what to do with their hard earned money. We don't.

Compassionate conservatives give drug companies every break they can. Their Christian profits are more important that the health of our nation.

Compassionate conservatives believe they can tell us what to do in our bedrooms. Theirs, quite rightly, remain private. So do their bathroom stalls.

Did those Bible-thumping compassionate Conservatives ever looked inside the Good Book? No, they are beating it into submission and creating a new God in their own sick image as they continue their centuries long tradition of doing the work of the Devil. They are the moneychangers that Jesus ran out of the temple, and HE was the Liberal they persecuted.

In reaction to this thoroughly un-Christian Conservative tradition, I lift my head proudly and proclaim, “I am a Liberal!”

I hope President Barack Obama keeps the proud Liberal tradition of social justice alive and well during his term (s) of office.

Bill Coleman

Tags:

(19 comments | Leave a comment)

Comments
 
[User Picture]
From:hardly_angelic
Date:November 5th, 2008 07:48 pm (UTC)
(Link)
Well done. Kudos to your father. I'm saving this to my Memories.
[User Picture]
From:awfulhorrid
Date:November 5th, 2008 08:11 pm (UTC)
(Link)
Well said! Thank you to you and your father!
[User Picture]
From:kylakae
Date:November 5th, 2008 08:49 pm (UTC)
(Link)
Nice!
[User Picture]
From:philady
Date:November 5th, 2008 08:55 pm (UTC)
(Link)
OH SNAP!
[User Picture]
From:ericcoleman
Date:November 5th, 2008 08:57 pm (UTC)
(Link)
And I've already had someone unfriend me for it ...
[User Picture]
From:dement1a
Date:November 5th, 2008 09:01 pm (UTC)
(Link)
Aww, did someone get their widdle feelings hurt?
(Deleted comment)
[User Picture]
From:ericcoleman
Date:November 5th, 2008 09:08 pm (UTC)
(Link)
There are conservatives I know who A: would go through this and tell me where they think that it is wrong, B: will go "but, liberals did >insert whatever< too" and C: turn and run. I have a great deal of respect for the first group, a bit less for the second, and no real opinion at all for the latter, as they deserve nothing.
[User Picture]
From:ntrlstgrl
Date:November 5th, 2008 09:41 pm (UTC)
(Link)
Seriously. That's pathetic. Are their views so shallow they can't stand to be challenged? Their only option is to turn their backs and say "because we disagree, we can't be friends?"

I ended a friendship once over political views, but it wasn't because we were on polar opposites (them liberal, me conservative, or vice versa).

There's black and white, and then there's grey. What happened to intelligent debate over the issues? What happened to agreeing to disagree?
[User Picture]
From:philady
Date:November 5th, 2008 10:30 pm (UTC)
(Link)
If someone's going to take their ball and go home over that, that's totally weak.

I only wish my parents were awesome enough to write something like that.
[User Picture]
From:celtic_catgirl
Date:November 5th, 2008 09:23 pm (UTC)
(Link)
agreed.
[User Picture]
From:ntrlstgrl
Date:November 5th, 2008 09:35 pm (UTC)
(Link)
Excellent.

In reaction to this thoroughly un-Christian Conservative tradition, I lift my head proudly and proclaim, “I am a Liberal!”

I concur.

Kudos to your dad!


[User Picture]
From:safira81
Date:November 5th, 2008 11:33 pm (UTC)

Gotta love Doc

(Link)
Through all his idiosycrasies, there are reasons why I still remember his classes so dearly. That is a wonderful piece of writing. I hope to be eloquent like him when I grow up!

Last night was truly a landmark - and as another friend on LJ wrote - REMEMBER this day... November 4th, 2008. It is as much a marker in our history as any other revolution, whether bloody, quiet, or scientific as any other.

Thanks to your Dad for expressing so well what must be said.

[User Picture]
From:jcw_da_dmg
Date:November 6th, 2008 12:03 am (UTC)
(Link)
Mind if I link to this?
[User Picture]
From:ericcoleman
Date:November 6th, 2008 12:48 am (UTC)
(Link)
Please do.
[User Picture]
From:lesa
Date:November 6th, 2008 02:16 pm (UTC)
(Link)
I am a Republican and work diligently to defy the stereotype. I wanted to say that I thought this was very well written and thoughtful. I will also add that it pains me that this is what most people assume about me when they hear that I am a Republican...

They are wrong, and the important thing is that I know this.

Kudos to your father, well done.
[User Picture]
From:gwdanton
Date:November 6th, 2008 10:17 pm (UTC)
(Link)
Yeah, well: remember that the "conservatives" who supported slavery before the Civil War and Jim Crow afterwards were part of the Democratic Party. Abraham Lincoln, the Great Emancipator himself, led the nascent Republican Party upon his election. One cannot say he was a "conservative" for his time.

Party platforms change for the times; it wasn't so long ago that the GOP were considered progressive. Even then, old-style "conservatives" would have been shocked to see Sarah Palin nominated Vice-President. So maybe the definition of "conservative" is also (*!!!*) evolving?
[User Picture]
From:jcw_da_dmg
Date:November 6th, 2008 10:45 pm (UTC)
(Link)
I'm glad you can appreciate this, Lesa. I for one make no such assumptions. I grew up SURROUNDED by Republicans.
[User Picture]
From:bammba_m
Date:November 6th, 2008 06:24 pm (UTC)
(Link)
Interesting.

Thanks for sharing.
Eric Coleman, Curmudgeon Powered by LiveJournal.com